|
On July 14, 2009,
the New York
Times, under the byline of Maureen Dowd, liberated white men
from their self-imposed dungeons of timidity. Dowd's Op-Ed, entitled
"White Men's Last Stand", elevated this
nearly extinct species onto the stage previously reserved for women
and minorities.
Maureen Dowd opened the door. Now white men are released. But white
men will not be allowed to stray too far because the un-ladies, that
is, the new women, will still need them for occasional stud work.
Women must maintain the influx of girls in order that the world may
continue (d)evolving.
Thanks to Dowd's angry,
frustrated, teenage-girl-style tirade, white men may now be referred
to as a group. No longer must they consider themselves inferior just
because they are spoken of in smarmy, snarly,
derisive spews by women and minorities. White men have been elevated
in today's segregated, trait-tallying culture by the New York Times
and Maureen Dowd.
Dowd apparently believes that the
weakened, timid, frail white men that she knows from the New York
Times, the US Congress, and Washington's liberal elite are
representational of all white men. Dowd apparently is unaware of the
white men who continue to populate much of the US, defend the US
from its enemies, and have ceded control and power to women simply
to be fair and provide opportunity to those unable to succeed
without extra affirmative action.
Women activists
proclaim that white men have damaged and mismanaged the
world. They exclaim that it is time to cede more power to women so
that they can then repair the damage inflicted upon the world by
white men. However, it is women who are proving to be inadequate
stewards and damagers of Western Civilization.
Women fail to see the long-running
grand view of the decline of Western
Civilization --- that which occurred
before the year 2000. Western Civilization's decline started during
the first third of the 20th century, gained momentum, and continues
to accelerate to this day.
The decline of Western
Civilization was concomitant with the empowerment of women. Women
gained the right to vote in the US in 1920 with ratification of the
20th Amendment of the US Constitution. The 1960s led to further
ceding of power by white men to all Americans
through legislation outlawing race-based discrimination
relating to voting and
poll taxes.
Dowd colored and dressed up in
simplistic political tone her bigoted and racist opinion that
women are great powerhouses who would have
achieved so very much if they had not been held back by white men.
Dowd denigrates women by that
assertion. Her assertion implies that women are not capable of
overcoming white men's power to hold them down.
To the contrary, most white men
who have been involved in building Western Civilization over the
last 2,500 years, from classic Greeks and Romans, onward to the
Reformation, Renaissance, Industrial Revolution, and the Age of
Information understood the process of building a civilization.
Their understanding mandated that they search for and accept
assistance from nearly anyone capable of contributing. Most of these
highly achieving white men -- if the philosophy of many such as John
Stuart Mill and John Locke is to be trusted -- welcomed and argued
for acceptance of input from anyone capable of providing advanced
thought.
Who held back women over the last
2,500 years? Why wasn't another sort of western civilization
developed by any women's groups? Why are South America, Africa,
Asia only capable of barely emulating Western Civilization? Why
aren't these cultures capable of advancing beyond Western
Civilization and proceeding onward in their own more advanced
directions? Why haven't several higher civilizations managed by
women over the last centuries created their own literature and
economic, cultural and scientific achievements? Why didn't at least
a few South American, African, Asian, and other civilizations evolve
to lift all its members as effectively as Western Civilization has?
Is it conceivable that only those
white men who developed Western Civilization over the last 2,500
years were capable enough to develop such a mechanism to raise most
of its members? Is white men's Western Civilization the only model
for success?
Why today do so many inadequate
individuals have the audacity to attack white men? Why today do so
many demonstratively inadequate individuals and groups have the
audacity to repeatedly shout, scream, and yell their assertion that
they are better and best at so many activities than are white men?
You know the answer to these
questions. Your mom taught you when you were young. Oh, your mom
didn't teach you the answer to this or many other questions? And
your mom wouldn't allow your dad to teach you?
OK, then here is the answer to
both of the above questions:
Individuals and groups who are
genuinely the best rarely need to shout to announce that they are
the best. Rather, their work -- the product of their mental and
physical labor -- stands out on its own. It is eventually perceived
by others of intellect as best.
Thanks to those white men who have
been consistent over the last five centuries of philosophical,
industrial, and technological invention, discovery, and
philosophical development started by classic Greek and Roman white
men, all people are free to use and benefit from their ultimate
product.
Their product -- the over-arching
accomplishment of mankind's white men --
has lifted the quality of life for all people everywhere to varying
degrees limited only by their own individual skills. That
grand product of white men is...
|